Rep. Jamie Raskin of California criticized a plan by U.S. President Trump to federally national guard, calling it "a misguided effort that disregards the needs of our country." She suggested a border wall or U.S.-Canada border wall would violate U.S.-Canadian relations and emphasized her support for federal oversight over uncertainty in enforcing such measures.
Rep. Jamie Raskin Responds to Trump’s Threat to Expand Deployments of National GuardIn a segment on *CBS Mornings Plus*, conservative Rep. Jamie Raskin addressed President Trump's plans to expand the deployment of the National Guard troops across more democratic cities, fearing it could undermine federal security and independence.
Raskin, a DC-based Rep., emphasized that the National Guard has been crucial for national security since at least the early 20th century. He argued that expanding its deployment could weaken federal control over critical infrastructure such as healthcare and education. “This threat is not about weakening the American people; it’s about undermining our ability to perform our functions,” he said, highlighting the long-term consequences on federal oversight.
Raskin's comment aligns with broader concerns raised by other policies like immigration reform or environmental initiatives that led to criticism but also underscored their importance for national security. He acknowledged the political motivations behind Trump's plan, noting that his focus shifted from national security to voter access and immigration reform.
The article concludes by stressing the need for federal oversight to ensure security isn’t unduly divided, emphasizing the balance between Republicans' conservative views on national security and Democrats’ resistance to government shutdowns.
------
